Why The MCU Hasn’t Introduced In The Chief, In accordance To Kevin Feige

Once we final noticed Tim Blake Nelson’s Dr. Samuel Sterns–and minor spoilers for The Unimaginable Hulk–he injected Tim Roth’s Emil Blonsky with the blood of The Hulk, which led to his personal expertise with the blood of Bruce Banner. One remaining shot of Nelson’s head beginning to remodel was all we bought, and like that, the villain often called The Chief was born. So why have not we seen him rear his prolonged skull but once more within the Marvel Cinematic Universe? Nicely, Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige has a solution to that query, and it goes one thing like this:

It is a humiliation of riches of locations we might go or characters we might reprise or carry again now that we’re… I believe Ragnarok is our seventeenth MCU movie. And you’d be shocked what number of… it is come up. It is come up. Simply discovering the precise place. And as I mentioned, if you cannot do it proper, do not do it or do it later, and the notion of ‘Hey, I am right here too! Subsequent!’ isn’t attention-grabbing to us. Abomination is in a jail someplace too.

It is laborious to argue with Feige’s declare that Marvel Comics has such a wealthy catalog of heroes and villains that it is form of troublesome to revisit anybody with no adequate excuse. The issue is not that The Chief is a personality that Kevin Feige would slightly neglect about, however as an alternative there are simply too many Marvel Comics villains that have not been used within the MCU canon. Why bring back a super-powered villain people hardly keep in mind, when there are such a lot of menacing baddies which are ready to make their very own distinctive impressions on audiences worldwide?

Although it additionally in all probability does not assist that the rights issues that persist between Marvel Studios and Common Studios nonetheless impact the opportunity of any type of solo Hulk follow-ups. As Feige additionally mentioned with Crave Online, the truth that The Unimaginable Hulk’s significantly distinctive authorized state of affairs has additionally prevented any type of return to not solely Tim Blake Nelson’s super-powered persuader, but additionally Tim Roth’s jacked-up Hulk wanna-be. Having a villain bench as deep as Marvel Comics’ rogue’s gallery does assist when attempting to maintain an empire going. And simply as Kevin Feige has admitted, it helps keep away from revisiting sure villains too usually by way of the varied phases of the MCU, although do not inform that to Tom Hiddleston’s Loki.

The Incredible Hulk The Leader comic appearance

With that in thoughts, there is a canon rationalization as to The Chief’s present whereabouts, and it is all due to The Avengers’ film tie-in entitled “Avengers’ Prelude: Fury’s Huge Week”. Apparently, due to a post-transformation run in with Natasha “Black Widow” Romanoff, the person previously often called Dr. Samuel Sterns is now formally in S.H.I.E.L.D. custody. Although it does not assist that he ended up in such a state of affairs after attempting to win Black Widow into his personal make use of, a gambit that resulted in Romanoff capturing Sterns within the leg to subdue him. So until Avengers: Infinity Warfare, or another future MCU movie requires one tremendous good tremendous villain to be launched from the clutches of Agent Coulson’s most interesting, we doubt we’ll be seeing him anytime quickly.

RELATED: Why We Nonetheless Have not Gotten An Avengers: Infinity Warfare Trailer

Thor: Ragnarok is at the moment in theaters, with Avengers: Infinity Warfare heading to our shores on Might 4th, 2018. If you wish to see what else is coming to dominate theaters within the subsequent 12 months, it is best to head over to our 2018 release schedule.

قالب وردپرس


    Leave a reply "Why The MCU Hasn’t Introduced In The Chief, In accordance To Kevin Feige"